Table of ContentsMy websiteDownload PDFGitHub Repository

3.4 The ABEGHHK (Higgs) mechanism

As highlighted in the previous section, gauge bosons in pure Yang-Mills theories are massless. This is in conflict, however, with the short observed range of the weak force, implying massive mediatory bosons. To resolve this, a series of work in the early 1960s by Anderson, Brout, Englert, Guralnik, Hagen, Higgs, and Kibble (ABEGHHK) yielded a mechanism to give mass to the gauge bosons without violating gauge invariance [107110], based on the concept of spontaneous symmetry breaking developed by Nambu [111112] and others.

By 1970, Glashow, Salam, Weinberg and others were able to use this mechanism to formulate a combined theory of weak and electromagnetic interactions, known as “electroweak” or Weinberg-Salam theory [113115]. Electroweak unification has been one of the most significant breakthroughs in theoretical physics with several Nobel prizes cumulatively awarded for these developments.

In this section we outline the ABEGHHK mechanism — commonly (but reductively) referred to as the “Higgs mechanism” — first for an abelian gauge theory in Section 3.4.1 and then for non-abelian gauge theories 3.4.2 like the SM.

3.4.1 The abelian Higgs mechanism

The Higgs mechanism is based on the idea of spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB), where the ground states of a physical system violate the overall symmetry. The classic example is the so-called “sombrero” potential for a complex scalar field ϕ:

V (ϕ) = λ 2(|ϕ|2 v2)2,
(3.4.1)

for constants λ and v, shown in Figure 3.7. The potential has is symmetric under a U(1) transformation of ϕ eϕ, but any specific ground state of |ϕ| = v will break this symmetry, as shown in the figure. SSB is a crucial concept in physics, with several applications in condensed matter and particle physics, including chiral symmetry breaking in QCD (see e.g. Tong SM [76] Chapter 3.2).

PIC

Figure 3.7. The “sombrero” potential for the Higgs field, reproduced from Ref. [5]. An initial state and a ground state breaking the U(1) symmetry are represented by the green balls at the top and bottom of the potential, respectively.

The Higgs mechanism is an application of SSB to gauge symmetries. The interpretation here of SSB a bit fiddly since, as emphasized above, gauge symmetries are not physical and cannot be spontaneously broken;16 what actually breaks is the corresponding global symmetry, as we outline below.

Consider our QED Lagrangian for a complex scalar field ϕ with the above potential:

L = 1 4FμνFμν + (D μϕ)Dμϕ + λ 2(|ϕ|2 v2)2.
(3.4.2)

As before, this Lagrangian possesses a U(1) gauge symmetry; however, this symmetry is “broken” by a particular ground state ϕ = ve (we can take δ = 0 WLOG). The fluctuations around the ground state can be parametrized as:

ϕ(x) = (v + σ(x))ei𝜃(x),
(3.4.3)

where σ and 𝜃 are two real fields. Plugging this into the Lagrangian gives us:

L = 1 4FμνFμν+ μσμσ+(v+σ)2( μ𝜃eAμ)(μ𝜃eAμ)λ(2v2σ2+2vσ3+ σ4 4 ).
(3.4.4)

We see first that σ can be interpreted as a normal scalar quantum field, with a quadratic mass term with mσ2 = 2λv2. The 𝜃 term is a bit more unusual;17 it only appears in the combination μ𝜃 eAμ. Hence, we can simply redefine the gauge field as Aμ A μ + 1 eμ𝜃, allowing it to “absorb” this DoF. Note that this takes the form of a gauge transformation of Aμ and thus does not affect the field strength tensor Fμν. The resulting Lagrangian is then:

L = 1 4FμνFμν + μσμσ + e2(v + σ)2A μA μ λ(2v2σ2 + 2vσ3 + σ4 4 ),
(3.4.5)

where we now have a mass term for the “gauge boson”, mA2 = 2e2v2!

3.4.2 The non-abelian Higgs mechanism

There is an analogous mechanism for a non-abelian gauge symmetry, as in the SM. One crucial difference is that the symmetry may only partially break from the gauge group G to a subgroup H (for example from SU(2) to a U(1)). In this case, the gauge bosons corresponding to the generators of G’s broken symmetries acquire mass as above, while the generators of H remain massless Goldstone bosons; as we will see in Chapter 4.2, in the SM these correspond to the massive W± / Z bosons and the massless photon, respectively. See e.g. Tong SM [76] Chapter 2.3.3 for an example.

16This is an implication of Elitzur’s theorem [116].

17In a non-gauge-theory, the 𝜃 field would be considered a massless “Goldstone boson” resulting from the spontaneously breakdown of the symmetry.